← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kobe Keller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Soo Eagles NOJHL 35 12 24 36 1.029 0.1752 0.1617 0.4359 0.4024
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SR 26 4 8 12 0.462
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SR 28 7 16 23 0.821
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC JR 14 1 5 6 0.429
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D1 BigTen SO 11 5 2 7 0.636
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 11 5 2 7 0.636
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stout D1 BigTen FR 21 2 5 7 0.333
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 21 2 5 7 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2019-20 · Wisconsin-Stout
+140.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22128
Forward overall
#1087
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Finlandia · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2016-17
0.483 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.