IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Watchorn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-05-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Northern Michigan Black Bears NOJHL 34 8 13 21 0.618 0.1571 0.1776 0.2562 0.2896
2007-08 — NAHL 34 2 4 6 0.176 0.0699 0.0719 0.1853 0.1906
2008-09 — NOJHL 38 7 17 24 0.632 0.1606 0.1564 0.2621 0.2553
2009-10 Soo Eagles NOJHL 19 9 14 23 1.210 0.3078 0.2875 0.5022 0.4691
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Finlandia D3 — SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Finlandia D3 — FR 12 1 3 4 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2010-11 · Finlandia
+65.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27125
Forward overall
#895
Forward born in 1989

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Max Brainin
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
James Pelton
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
C.J. Valerian
New England College · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.