IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Travis Marchant Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 36 6 10 16 0.444 0.0581 0.0581 0.1508 0.1508
2020-21 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 38 12 18 30 0.789 0.1033 0.1033 0.2680 0.2680
2021-22 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 43 23 30 53 1.233 0.1612 0.1500 0.4183 0.3894
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wentworth D3 CNE — 17 2 2 4 0.235
2022-23 Wentworth D3 CNE — 21 4 4 8 0.381
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2022-23 · Wentworth
+196.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16007
Forward overall
#753
Forward born in 2001
#943
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steve Zierke
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2010-11
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Blanton
Bowdoin · 2024-25
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny O'Donnell
Aurora · 2016-17
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.