IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Danny O'Donnell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-04-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0413 0.0427 0.1176 0.1215
2016-17 Great Falls Americans NA3HL 47 20 46 66 1.404 0.1692 0.1567 0.4436 0.4109
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 9 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 27 1 11 12 0.444
2018-19 Aurora D3 NCHA SO 27 1 1 2 0.074
2017-18 Aurora D3 NCHA FR 25 1 6 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2017-18 · Aurora
+166.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5778
Defenseman overall
#1024
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carson Rose
St. Scholastica · 2016-17
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dillon Steh
Becker · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brent Bisdee
SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.