← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Larkee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Eastview USHS-MN 26 3 0 3 0.115 0.0311 0.0311 0.0280 0.0280
2020-21 Eastview USHS-MN 19 5 6 11 0.579 0.1558 0.1558 0.1406 0.1406
2021-22 Eastview USHS-MN 27 8 9 17 0.630 0.1695 0.1695 0.1529 0.1529
2022-23 Minnesota Moose NA3HL 27 13 13 26 0.963 0.1160 0.1200 0.3042 0.3146
2023-24 Minnesota Moose NA3HL 47 12 44 56 1.192 0.1436 0.1416 0.3764 0.3712
2024-25 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 47 15 22 37 0.787 0.2923 0.2767 0.8335 0.7891
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 27 3 12 15 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2025-26 · Saint John's
+191.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19561
Forward overall
#947
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2011-12
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2018-19
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2014-15
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.