IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dalton Jay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-05-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Milton Menace OJHL 50 14 12 26 0.520 0.1453 0.1459 0.3589 0.3603
2010-11 Burlington Cougars OJHL 50 17 29 46 0.920 0.2570 0.2460 0.6349 0.6078
2011-12 — OJHL 50 22 27 49 0.980 0.2738 0.2500 0.6763 0.6176
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 27 19 6 25 0.926
2014-15 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 27 14 10 24 0.889
2013-14 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SO 27 11 13 24 0.889
2012-13 Westfield State D3 MASCAC FR 25 9 11 20 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2012-13 · Westfield State
+276.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15736
Forward overall
#616
Forward born in 1991
#998
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Dicker
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gramm McCormack
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Lison
Bowdoin · 2013-14
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.