← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gramm McCormack Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 44 3 3 6 0.136 0.0501 0.0501 0.1440 0.1440
2020-21 NAHL 46 2 4 6 0.130 0.0479 0.0479 0.1376 0.1376
2021-22 NAHL 65 11 25 36 0.554 0.2035 0.1910 0.5845 0.5485
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 26 4 4 8 0.308
2024-25 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 24 2 7 9 0.375
2023-24 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 27 8 11 19 0.704
2022-23 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 27 12 18 30 1.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.11
2022-23 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+579.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40558
Forward overall
#2262
Forward born in 2001
#4337
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2024-25
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.