IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Dicker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1857 0.1857 0.5294 0.5294
2020-21 Charleston Colonials USPHL-Premier 34 13 25 38 1.118 0.1504 0.1504 0.3804 0.3804
2021-22 Pueblo Bulls USPHL-Premier 45 19 32 51 1.133 0.1525 0.1423 0.3858 0.3600
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arcadia D3 MAC SR 24 2 9 11 0.458
2024-25 Arcadia D3 MAC JR 25 3 9 12 0.480
2023-24 Arcadia D3 MAC SO 25 4 9 13 0.520
2022-23 Arcadia D3 MAC FR 24 5 8 13 0.542
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2022-23 · Arcadia
+344.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27380
Forward overall
#1072
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Sheehy
New England · 2018-19
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Pizzimenti
Concordia Wisconsin · 2021-22
0.346 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Novick
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.