IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Spezia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-06-07 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Nürnberg Ice Tigers · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1837 0.1913 0.5278 0.5496
2012-13 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 23 4 2 6 0.261 0.1539 0.1466 0.7836 0.7463
2013-14 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 58 10 12 22 0.379 0.2237 0.2026 1.1392 1.0317
2025-26 Nürnberg Ice Tigers DEL 50 18 12 30 0.600 1.5000 1.3615 5.0869 4.6172
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SR 33 10 6 16 0.485
2016-17 Bowling Green D1 WCHA JR 41 8 22 30 0.732
2015-16 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SO 41 10 8 18 0.439
2014-15 Bowling Green D1 WCHA FR 32 6 2 8 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2014-15 · Bowling Green
+62.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#8831
Forward overall
#356
Forward born in 1993

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.