← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Spezia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-06-07 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Nürnberg Ice Tigers · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1857 0.1934 0.5294 0.5513
2012-13 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 23 4 2 6 0.261 0.1661 0.1582 0.7818 0.7446
2013-14 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 58 10 12 22 0.379 0.2415 0.2187 1.1366 1.0293
2025-26 Nürnberg Ice Tigers DEL 50 18 12 30 0.600
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SR 33 10 6 16 0.485
2016-17 Bowling Green D1 WCHA JR 41 8 22 30 0.732
2015-16 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SO 41 10 8 18 0.439
2014-15 Bowling Green D1 WCHA FR 32 6 2 8 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2014-15 · Bowling Green
+50.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11737
Forward overall
#425
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2009-10
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2010-11
1.250 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.