| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Port Huron Fighting Falcons | NAHL | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.500 | 0.1857 | 0.1934 | 0.5294 | 0.5513 |
| 2012-13 | Dubuque Fighting Saints | USHL | 23 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0.261 | 0.1661 | 0.1582 | 0.7818 | 0.7446 |
| 2013-14 | Youngstown Phantoms | USHL | 58 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 0.379 | 0.2415 | 0.2187 | 1.1366 | 1.0293 |
| 2025-26 | Nürnberg Ice Tigers | DEL | 50 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 0.600 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Bowling Green | D1 | WCHA | SR | 33 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 0.485 |
| 2016-17 | Bowling Green | D1 | WCHA | JR | 41 | 8 | 22 | 30 | 0.732 |
| 2015-16 | Bowling Green | D1 | WCHA | SO | 41 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 0.439 |
| 2014-15 | Bowling Green | D1 | WCHA | FR | 32 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 0.250 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.