IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Ostlie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Omaha Lancers USHL 54 1 8 9 0.167 0.0983 0.0980 0.5007 0.4990
2012-13 Omaha Lancers USHL 61 1 13 14 0.230 0.1354 0.1277 0.6893 0.6503
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SR 30 1 1 2 0.067
2015-16 Notre Dame D1 BigTen JR 27 1 1 2 0.074
2014-15 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SO 24 1 2 3 0.125
2013-14 Notre Dame D1 BigTen FR 12 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#41673
Forward overall
#1523
Forward born in 1993
#3580
in USHL

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colby Audette
Becker · 2017-18
0.650 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor van Weelie
Concordia · 2022-23
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Blanton
Bowdoin · 2023-24
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.