IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Luschinski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-05-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 St. James Canadians MJHL 62 13 26 39 0.629 0.1779 0.1820 0.3963 0.4054
2003-04 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 64 36 22 58 0.906 0.2564 0.2503 0.5710 0.5575
2004-05 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 61 31 26 57 0.934 0.2643 0.2455 0.5888 0.5470
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 11 1 2 3 0.273
2007-08 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 28 3 7 10 0.357
2006-07 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 23 5 8 13 0.565
2005-06 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 13 4 4 8 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2005-06 · St. Scholastica
+190.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15419
Forward overall
#526
Forward born in 1984
#301
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luc Boby
Utica · 2012-13
0.882 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Gauthier
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kelby Lorenz
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.