IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Luschinski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-05-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 St. James Canadians MJHL 62 13 26 39 0.629 0.1211 0.1239 0.3966 0.4057
2003-04 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 64 36 22 58 0.906 0.1744 0.1703 0.5714 0.5579
2004-05 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 61 31 26 57 0.934 0.1799 0.1671 0.5892 0.5474
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 11 1 2 3 0.273
2007-08 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 28 3 7 10 0.357
2006-07 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 23 5 8 13 0.565
2005-06 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 13 4 4 8 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2005-06 · St. Scholastica
+327.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23633
Forward overall
#688
Forward born in 1984
#256
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Morton
Curry · 2024-25
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Roman Gaudet
SUNY Morrisville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Luc Boby
Utica · 2012-13
0.882 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.