IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Trathen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 12 1 0 1 0.083 0.0112 0.0115 0.0284 0.0292
2022-23 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 44 20 26 46 1.046 0.1407 0.1377 0.3559 0.3483
2023-24 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 44 35 38 73 1.659 0.2233 0.2077 0.5648 0.5255
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Dartmouth D3 — SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 UMass Dartmouth D3 — FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27896
Forward overall
#1260
Forward born in 2003
#666
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jared Christy
New England · 2018-19
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Bruce
Williams · 2003-04
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Philip Elgstam
Norwich · 2018-19
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.