IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter Rodrigues Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-02-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 North York Rangers OJHL 44 10 9 19 0.432 0.1058 0.1109 0.2973 0.3117
2008-09 North York Rangers OJHL 47 13 24 37 0.787 0.1929 0.1924 0.5420 0.5405
2009-10 Markham Waxers OJHL 44 10 15 25 0.568 0.1393 0.1316 0.3912 0.3696
2010-11 Markham Waxers OJHL 18 18 13 31 1.722 0.4221 0.3791 1.1857 1.0650
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 6 0 1 1 0.167
2012-13 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 11 1 1 2 0.182
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#12636
Forward overall
#512
Forward born in 1990
#309
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Dozois
Wentworth · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Roman Ammirato
Utica · 2013-14
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Everson
Utica · 2016-17
0.895 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.