← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Everson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0399 0.0443 0.0986 0.1094
2013-14 CCHL 37 4 2 6 0.162 0.0463 0.0491 0.1256 0.1333
2014-15 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 58 12 23 35 0.603 0.2015 0.2042 0.5601 0.5676
2015-16 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 60 18 24 42 0.700 0.1998 0.1931 0.5419 0.5238
2016-17 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 59 17 53 70 1.186 0.3386 0.3095 0.9184 0.8394
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Utica D3 UCHC GR 27 10 15 25 0.926
2020-21 Utica D3 UCHC SR 9 8 5 13 1.444
2019-20 Utica D3 UCHC JR 19 3 5 8 0.421
2018-19 Utica D3 UCHC SO 24 5 20 25 1.042
2017-18 Utica D3 UCHC FR 19 4 13 17 0.895
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.89
2017-18 · Utica
+297.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13360
Forward overall
#525
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bowdoin · 2005-06
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2015-16
1.482 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.