IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin MacCormack Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-01-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Brockville Braves CCHL 42 14 20 34 0.809 0.1756 0.1655 0.6263 0.5903
2005-06 Brockville Braves CCHL 47 20 27 47 1.000 0.2169 0.1949 0.7737 0.6951
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SR 27 9 16 25 0.926
2008-09 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 24 9 13 22 0.917
2007-08 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SO 24 12 14 26 1.083
2006-07 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC FR 25 8 13 21 0.840
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.84
2006-07 · Bowdoin
+435.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16645
Forward overall
#537
Forward born in 1985
#229
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marc Biggs
Salve Regina · 2011-12
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Sleep
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.516 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Rodrigues
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.