← New Search ↗ Social Card

J.B. Baker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-01-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 58 9 10 19 0.328 0.1204 0.1290 0.3458 0.3706
2013-14 Rio Grande Valley Killer Bees NAHL 53 7 11 18 0.340 0.1248 0.1275 0.3584 0.3661
2014-15 NAHL 44 7 9 16 0.364 0.1336 0.1295 0.3838 0.3719
2015-16 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 60 16 18 34 0.567 0.2082 0.1925 0.5982 0.5532
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Nichols D1 CNE SR 27 8 25 33 1.222
2019-20 Nichols D3 CNE SR 27 8 25 33 1.222
2018-19 Nichols D1 CNE JR 18 4 6 10 0.556
2018-19 Nichols D3 CNE JR 18 4 6 10 0.556
2017-18 Nichols D3 CNE SO 30 15 22 37 1.233
2016-17 Nichols D3 CNE FR 27 16 24 40 1.482
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.48
2016-17 · Nichols
+934.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31365
Forward overall
#1256
Forward born in 1995
#2912
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Misericordia · 2022-23
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Beloit · 2024-25
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.