IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Toomey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 West Bend Power NA3HL 13 7 4 11 0.846 0.0936 0.0899 — —
2022-23 West Bend Power NA3HL 43 32 32 64 1.488 0.1646 0.1506 0.4715 0.4314
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Misericordia D3 MAC SO 23 2 10 12 0.522
2024-25 Misericordia D3 MAC — 8 1 2 3 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2024-25 · Misericordia
+246.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17477
Forward overall
#930
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tal Halliday
Concordia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Fader
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2017-18
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew McCann
SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.