IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tal Halliday Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-01-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 — NAHL 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0413 0.0413 0.1176 0.1176
2020-21 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 38 4 18 22 0.579 0.0698 0.0698 0.1829 0.1829
2021-22 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 42 13 32 45 1.071 0.1291 0.1179 0.3385 0.3091
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 20 1 6 7 0.350
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 26 5 7 12 0.462
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 24 0 9 9 0.375
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12220
Defenseman overall
#1693
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Theoren Tydingo
Wesleyan · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Favaro
Curry · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Minerva
Aurora · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.