IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Theoren Tydingo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-01-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 New Mexico Mustangs NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 42 2 2 4 0.095 0.0353 0.0343 0.1008 0.0979
2013-14 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 39 10 20 30 0.769 0.1651 0.1528 0.3767 0.3487
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 20 1 2 3 0.150
2016-17 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 25 3 3 6 0.240
2015-16 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 22 0 1 1 0.045
2014-15 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#10749
Defenseman overall
#1402
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danny Rock
SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy Quesnel
SUNY Potsdam · 2021-22
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Antenucci
Trine · 2021-22
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.