IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Danny Rock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Rochester Jr. Americans USPHL-Premier-Classic 39 5 14 19 0.487 0.1463 0.1449 0.4013 0.3976
2016-17 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 40 14 9 23 0.575 0.1727 0.1627 0.4736 0.4461
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 26 3 11 14 0.538
2018-19 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 26 6 8 14 0.538
2017-18 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 25 4 3 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2017-18 · SUNY Brockport
+110.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25703
Forward overall
#1092
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Serpico
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Gieseler
Adrian · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stefan Decosse
SUNY Geneseo · 2007-08
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.