IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stefan Decosse Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-01-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1297 0.1310 0.4861 0.4909
2006-07 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 55 16 32 48 0.873 0.3397 0.3248 1.2727 1.2169
2007-08 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 32 8 18 26 0.812 0.3162 0.2853 1.1849 1.0690
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SR 13 3 11 14 1.077
2010-11 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 21 3 13 16 0.762
2009-10 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 24 8 19 27 1.125
2008-09 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 22 4 8 12 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2008-09 · SUNY Geneseo
+111.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8799
Forward overall
#361
Forward born in 1987
#601
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Max Rasberg
New England · 2016-17
0.964 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Volonnino
Plymouth State · 2014-15
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Everson
Utica · 2016-17
0.895 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.