IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Antenucci Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 58 9 13 22 0.379 0.1408 0.1515 0.4016 0.4321
2019-20 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 48 10 8 18 0.375 0.2388 0.2388 1.1238 1.1238
2020-21 Omaha Lancers USHL 34 3 3 6 0.176 0.1124 0.1124 0.5289 0.5289
2021-22 — NAHL 55 9 15 24 0.436 0.1620 0.1503 0.4621 0.4288
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trine D3 NCHA SR 28 8 13 21 0.750
2024-25 Trine D3 NCHA JR 28 10 12 22 0.786
2023-24 Trine D3 NCHA SO 28 15 19 34 1.214
2022-23 Trine D3 NCHA FR 24 10 9 19 0.792
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2022-23 · Trine
+513.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25395
Forward overall
#976
Forward born in 2001
#2800
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tal Halliday
Concordia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Fader
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2017-18
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Rook
Skidmore · 2017-18
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.