← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeremy Quesnel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Cornwall Colts CCHL 54 8 6 14 0.259 0.0740 0.0814 0.2007 0.2207
2018-19 Cornwall Colts CCHL 59 10 15 25 0.424 0.1209 0.1276 0.3280 0.3461
2019-20 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 61 17 19 36 0.590 0.1684 0.1684 0.4569 0.4569
2020-21 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 51 16 21 37 0.726 0.2071 0.1870 0.5616 0.5071
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SR 25 4 6 10 0.400
2024-25 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC JR 23 5 5 10 0.435
2023-24 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 25 3 2 5 0.200
2022-23 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 23 8 3 11 0.478
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2022-23 · SUNY Potsdam
+242.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23617
Forward overall
#877
Forward born in 2001
#749
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2013-14
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2021-22
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.