← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeremy Quesnel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Cornwall Colts CCHL 54 8 6 14 0.259 0.0562 0.0618 0.2006 0.2206
2018-19 Cornwall Colts CCHL 59 10 15 25 0.424 0.0919 0.0970 0.3278 0.3459
2019-20 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 61 17 19 36 0.590 0.1280 0.1280 0.4566 0.4566
2020-21 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 51 16 21 37 0.726 0.1574 0.1421 0.5613 0.5069
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SR 25 4 6 10 0.400
2024-25 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC JR 23 5 5 10 0.435
2023-24 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 25 3 2 5 0.200
2022-23 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 23 8 3 11 0.478
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2022-23 · SUNY Potsdam
+350.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29020
Forward overall
#1522
Forward born in 2001
#622
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2024-25
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Maria · 2021-22
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.