IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Dozois Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Brockville Braves CCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2007-08 Orleans Blues CCHL 41 11 14 25 0.610 0.1323 0.1334 0.4718 0.4758
2008-09 — CCHL 48 6 14 20 0.417 0.0904 0.0859 0.3224 0.3062
2009-10 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 44 19 51 70 1.591 0.2657 0.2462 0.6623 0.6137
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Wentworth D3 CNE — 27 4 14 18 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2010-11 · Wentworth
+327.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20444
Forward overall
#687
Forward born in 1989

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gramm McCormack
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Mohler
Curry · 2007-08
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Dicker
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.