IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Tersoni Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Tilton NE-Prep 27 10 15 25 0.926 0.1786 0.1786 0.4237 0.4237
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 31 26 18 44 1.419 0.1601 0.1601 0.4829 0.4829
2021-22 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 44 27 39 66 1.500 0.2195 0.2105 0.7355 0.7054
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New England D3 — — 23 4 7 11 0.478
2024-25 New England D3 — — 24 2 2 4 0.167
2023-24 New England D3 — — 23 0 6 6 0.261
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2023-24 · New England
+54.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6938
Forward overall
#280
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danny Bosio
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Glenn Wiswell
Castleton · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Sleep
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.516 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.