← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Tersoni Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Tilton NE-Prep 27 10 15 25 0.926 0.1862 0.1862 0.4234 0.4234
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 31 26 18 44 1.419 0.1862 0.1862 0.4819 0.4819
2021-22 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 44 27 39 66 1.500 0.3465 0.3323 0.7338 0.7038
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of New England D3 CNE SR 23 4 7 11 0.478
2024-25 University of New England D3 CNE — 24 2 2 4 0.167
2023-24 University of New England D3 CNE — 23 0 6 6 0.261
2022-23 University of New England D3 CNE — 24 5 5 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2022-23 · University of New England
+77.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7608
Forward overall
#335
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Olaf · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2024-25
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.