IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Danny Bosio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-02-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Collingwood Blues OJHL 39 15 19 34 0.872 0.2436 0.2304 0.6016 0.5689
2016-17 Collingwood Blues OJHL 48 27 32 59 1.229 0.3434 0.3094 0.8483 0.7643
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 27 6 16 22 0.815
2018-19 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 29 9 4 13 0.448
2017-18 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 21 5 7 12 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2017-18 · SUNY Geneseo
+140.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10280
Forward overall
#397
Forward born in 1996
#470
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arlen Marshall
Manhattanville · 2005-06
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Cole
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2023-24
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gordon Bell
SUNY Potsdam · 2000-01
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.