← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Kesselring Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New Hampton NE-Prep 34 1 6 7 0.206 0.0397 0.0397 0.0942 0.0942
2021-22 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 27 13 11 24 0.889 0.1715 0.1715 0.4068 0.4068
2022-23 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 50 21 19 40 0.800 0.3082 0.3131 1.1657 1.1843
2023-24 Fargo Force USHL 23 1 5 6 0.261 0.1539 0.1453 0.7687 0.7257
2024-25 BCHL 52 25 28 53 1.019 0.3927 0.3612 1.4851 1.3660
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Curry D3 CNE 20 5 10 15 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2025-26 · Curry
+218.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14417
Forward overall
#680
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2007-08
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby · 2004-05
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.