IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitch Stephens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-08-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 28 3 3 6 0.214 0.0834 0.0856 0.3125 0.3209
2001-02 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 59 21 33 54 0.915 0.3562 0.3461 1.3348 1.2970
2002-03 Yorkton Terriers SJHL 60 31 46 77 1.283 0.3707 0.3501 0.9661 0.9124
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SR 26 10 45 55 2.115
2005-06 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 30 16 28 44 1.467
2004-05 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 29 15 25 40 1.379
2003-04 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 26 9 19 28 1.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.08
2003-04 · SUNY Geneseo
+261.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10404
Forward overall
#385
Forward born in 1982

D1 Comparables

Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Adams
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jarrod Fitzpatrick
Utica · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Trann
St. Norbert · 2000-01
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Orrin Hergott
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.839 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.