← New Search ↗ Social Card

Danny Liscio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 10 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 Brampton Capitals OJHL 49 15 15 30 0.612 0.1501 0.1598 0.4215 0.4488
2012-13 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 54 18 15 33 0.611 0.1498 0.1520 0.4207 0.4269
2013-14 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 53 24 29 53 1.000 0.2451 0.2362 0.6885 0.6636
2014-15 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 51 29 36 65 1.274 0.3124 0.2850 0.8775 0.8004
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 24 15 11 26 1.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.08
2015-16 · SUNY Morrisville
+376.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15137
Forward overall
#615
Forward born in 1994
#475
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2023-24
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2013-14
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2023-24
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.