← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominic Thomas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Hermantown USHS-MN 13 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Hermantown USHS-MN 19 7 11 18 0.947 0.1167 0.1167 0.2301 0.2301
2021-22 Hermantown USHS-MN 31 14 14 28 0.903 0.1113 0.1113 0.2194 0.2194
2022-23 NA3HL 26 5 11 16 0.615 0.0681 0.0697 0.1950 0.1996
2023-24 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 38 22 23 45 1.184 0.1310 0.1278 0.5250 0.5191
2024-25 Winnipeg Monarchs MJHL 23 7 6 13 0.565 0.1088 0.0996 0.3562 0.3260
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamline D3 MIAC 19 5 3 8 0.421
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2025-26 · Hamline
+343.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19485
Forward overall
#1020
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2015-16
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2012-13
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.