← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taeron Lewis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 43 8 9 17 0.395 0.1118 0.1198 0.2491 0.2669
2013-14 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 38 6 5 11 0.289 0.0819 0.0836 0.1824 0.1862
2014-15 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 40 15 15 30 0.750 0.2122 0.2056 0.4726 0.4578
2015-16 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 56 26 42 68 1.214 0.3435 0.3147 0.7651 0.7010
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 27 12 11 23 0.852
2018-19 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 31 7 5 12 0.387
2017-18 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 25 4 5 9 0.360
2016-17 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 26 3 4 7 0.269
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2016-17 · Norwich
+16.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15397
Forward overall
#562
Forward born in 1995
#299
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.516 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2011-12
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.