IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marc Biggs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-02-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Texas Tornado NAHL 47 15 17 32 0.681 0.2502 0.2437 0.7187 0.6999
2011-12 Texas Tornado NAHL 58 19 23 42 0.724 0.2660 0.2459 0.7643 0.7066
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 28 11 7 18 0.643
2014-15 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 23 10 13 23 1.000
2013-14 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 24 8 14 22 0.917
2012-13 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 26 15 10 25 0.962
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2012-13 · Salve Regina
+358.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17577
Forward overall
#657
Forward born in 1991
#999
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Glenn Wiswell
Castleton · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Schlifke
Fredonia · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Bosio
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.