IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Gori Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-02-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Dauphin Kings MJHL 52 12 20 32 0.615 0.1741 0.1743 0.3878 0.3883
2002-03 Dauphin Kings MJHL 61 14 33 47 0.770 0.2180 0.2095 0.4855 0.4667
2003-04 Dauphin Kings MJHL 44 17 23 40 0.909 0.2572 0.2352 0.5728 0.5239
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 14 2 3 5 0.357
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2004-05 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+85.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19077
Forward overall
#666
Forward born in 1983

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Philip Elgstam
Norwich · 2018-19
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Keegan Bruce
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnny Hurd
Tufts · 2021-22
1.087 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.