IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keegan Bruce Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-01-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Coquitlam Express BCHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0486 0.0516 0.1823 0.1934
2009-10 Coquitlam Express BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 58 22 26 48 0.828 0.2391 0.2327 0.6230 0.6064
2011-12 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 58 23 53 76 1.310 0.3785 0.3479 0.9864 0.9065
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 26 15 19 34 1.308
2014-15 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 28 6 14 20 0.714
2013-14 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 27 5 7 12 0.444
2012-13 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 25 5 5 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2012-13 · St. Scholastica
+54.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9068
Forward overall
#353
Forward born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Paul
Framingham State · 2016-17
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Paquette
Adrian · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Reid Bibb
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.