IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sebastian Hamming Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-02-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 35 4 5 9 0.257 0.0659 0.0675 0.1905 0.1952
2022-23 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 52 7 29 36 0.692 0.1333 0.1292 0.4363 0.4227
2023-24 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 58 9 43 52 0.897 0.1726 0.1582 0.5650 0.5178
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamilton D3 NESCAC — 11 1 2 3 0.273
2024-25 Hamilton D3 NESCAC — 22 2 6 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2024-25 · Hamilton
+162.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7359
Defenseman overall
#1743
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Rust
Adrian · 2013-14
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Gooch
Neumann · 2003-04
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wiggle Kerbrat
Wesleyan · 2018-19
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.