IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Arlen Marshall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-03-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 53 13 10 23 0.434 0.1254 0.1351 0.3267 0.3519
2003-04 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 51 25 35 60 1.177 0.3399 0.3498 0.8857 0.9116
2004-05 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 54 25 32 57 1.056 0.3050 0.2989 0.7947 0.7789
2005-06 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 54 20 29 49 0.907 0.2621 0.2446 0.6831 0.6374
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Manhattanville D3 — SR 27 9 26 35 1.296
2008-09 Manhattanville D3 — JR 25 7 15 22 0.880
2007-08 Manhattanville D3 — SO 28 11 13 24 0.857
2006-07 Manhattanville D3 — FR 25 11 10 21 0.840
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.84
2006-07 · Manhattanville
+268.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10958
Forward overall
#386
Forward born in 1985
#146
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Singer
Wentworth · 2002-03
0.897 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Froese
St. Norbert · 2013-14
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Felser
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.