← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devin Panzeca Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — NA3HL 34 22 9 31 0.912 0.1162 0.1238 0.2884 0.3072
2015-16 Timmins Rock NOJHL 29 17 10 27 0.931 0.1585 0.1602 0.3946 0.3988
2016-17 Northeast Generals NAHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1837 0.1790 0.5284 0.5147
2017-18 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0735 0.0680 0.2114 0.1955
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Potsdam D1 — SO 23 3 6 9 0.391
2019-20 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 23 3 6 9 0.391
2018-19 Potsdam D1 — FR 24 6 10 16 0.667
2018-19 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 24 6 10 16 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2018-19 · Potsdam
+593.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7055
Forward overall
#339
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2007-08
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2007-08
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.