IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steve Miles Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-02-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Nepean Raiders CCHL 26 3 5 8 0.308 0.0878 0.0877 0.2382 0.2381
2006-07 Nepean Raiders CCHL 40 10 21 31 0.775 0.2212 0.2101 0.5999 0.5699
2007-08 Nepean Raiders CCHL 52 14 30 44 0.846 0.2415 0.2178 0.6550 0.5908
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Castleton D3 — SO 21 3 6 9 0.429
2008-09 Castleton D3 — FR 13 1 2 3 0.231
2008-09 Salem State D3 — FR 4 0 0 0 0.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2008-09 · Castleton
+25.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20223
Forward overall
#800
Forward born in 1987
#614
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ikki Kogawa
Wisconsin-Superior · 2023-24
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Kilty
Endicott · 2015-16
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brody Seitz
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.