IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Rudek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Northeast Generals NA3HL 31 7 8 15 0.484 0.0607 0.0618 0.1528 0.1555
2017-18 Northeast Generals NA3HL 26 9 15 24 0.923 0.1158 0.1120 0.2914 0.2817
2018-19 Northeast Generals NA3HL 45 26 51 77 1.711 0.2147 0.1962 0.5402 0.4938
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 — 12 2 5 7 0.583
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D1 NE10 SO 6 0 5 5 0.833
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 — 6 0 5 5 0.833
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.83
2020-21 · Franklin Pierce
+499.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20929
Forward overall
#1007
Forward born in 1998
#459
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vinny Post
Adrian · 2015-16
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
John Stevenson
Castleton · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Friedman
Trinity · 2024-25
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.