IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Bobrow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Wellington Dukes OJHL 41 4 9 13 0.317 0.0886 0.0887 0.2188 0.2191
2008-09 Wellington Dukes OJHL 51 7 20 27 0.529 0.1479 0.1405 0.3653 0.3470
2009-10 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 31 6 17 23 0.742 0.2117 0.1911 0.5743 0.5185
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 20 3 6 9 0.450
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — JR 20 0 5 5 0.250
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — SO 24 4 7 11 0.458
2010-11 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — FR 27 9 9 18 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2010-11 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+355.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19151
Forward overall
#765
Forward born in 1989
#1389
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Corcoran
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Cowlthorp
Norwich · 2016-17
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Gooch
Neumann · 2003-04
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.