← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Cowlthorp Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-03-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Virden Oil Capitals MJHL 48 6 5 11 0.229 0.0441 0.0452 0.1445 0.1481
2015-16 Virden Oil Capitals MJHL 55 5 11 16 0.291 0.0560 0.0545 0.1834 0.1784
2016-17 Virden Oil Capitals MJHL 58 24 28 52 0.897 0.1726 0.1594 0.5654 0.5222
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Norwich D1 LittleEast SR 8 3 0 3 0.375
2020-21 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 8 3 0 3 0.375
2019-20 Norwich D1 LittleEast JR 19 3 1 4 0.210
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 19 3 1 4 0.210
2018-19 Norwich D1 LittleEast SO 25 5 1 6 0.240
2018-19 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 25 5 1 6 0.240
2017-18 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 26 4 11 15 0.577
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2017-18 · Norwich
+474.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36790
Forward overall
#1593
Forward born in 1996
#721
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Middlebury · 2024-25
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2018-19
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.