IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Cowlthorp Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-03-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Virden Oil Capitals MJHL 48 6 5 11 0.229 0.0648 0.0664 0.1444 0.1480
2015-16 Virden Oil Capitals MJHL 55 5 11 16 0.291 0.0823 0.0800 0.1833 0.1783
2016-17 Virden Oil Capitals MJHL 58 24 28 52 0.897 0.2536 0.2342 0.5649 0.5218
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 8 3 0 3 0.375
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 19 3 1 4 0.210
2018-19 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 25 5 1 6 0.240
2017-18 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 26 4 11 15 0.577
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2017-18 · Norwich
+290.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26577
Forward overall
#1132
Forward born in 1996
#848
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Corcoran
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Philip Elgstam
Norwich · 2018-19
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Bruce
Williams · 2003-04
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.