← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Corcoran Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-03-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2005-06 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 54 10 14 24 0.444 0.1730 0.1850 0.6481 0.6931
2006-07 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 56 21 26 47 0.839 0.3267 0.3319 1.2240 1.2433
2007-08 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 59 26 15 41 0.695 0.2705 0.2602 1.0134 0.9748
2008-09 BCHL 52 20 22 42 0.808 0.3144 0.2892 1.1779 1.0836
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 St. Scholastica D3 SR 25 12 17 29 1.160
2011-12 St. Scholastica D3 JR 28 17 16 33 1.179
2010-11 St. Scholastica D3 SO 22 3 4 7 0.318
2009-10 St. Scholastica D3 FR 28 9 9 18 0.643
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2009-10 · St. Scholastica
+170.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10211
Forward overall
#472
Forward born in 1988
#749
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Potsdam · 2008-09
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.