IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Stewart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Yellowstone Quake NA3HL 38 20 15 35 0.921 0.1110 0.1086 0.2910 0.2846
2017-18 Yellowstone Quake NA3HL 39 37 54 91 2.333 0.2812 0.2607 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SR 20 5 14 19 0.950
2020-21 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SO 21 6 2 8 0.381
2018-19 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 FR 26 5 7 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2018-19 · Southern New Hampshire
+169.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18826
Forward overall
#774
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jacob McPartland
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bailey Conklin
Canton · 2017-18
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luc Boby
Utica · 2011-12
0.882 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.