IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob McPartland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Holy Family USHS-MN 26 7 4 11 0.423 0.1139 0.1139 0.1028 0.1028
2020-21 Holy Family USHS-MN 18 10 10 20 1.111 0.2991 0.2991 0.2699 0.2699
2022-23 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 43 14 24 38 0.884 0.1065 0.1046 1.0588 1.0535
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 27 5 4 9 0.333
2024-25 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 23 3 8 11 0.478
2023-24 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 21 4 2 6 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2023-24 · Saint John's
+83.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24436
Forward overall
#1066
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jay Dickman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
John Simonson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Heinonen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Garret Clemment
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Cox
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Scanlon
UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Brown
Amherst · 2011-12
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.