← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Cox Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 West Bend Power NA3HL 47 20 31 51 1.085 0.1308 0.1409 0.3428 0.3692
2015-16 West Bend Power NA3HL 47 18 34 52 1.106 0.1333 0.1371 0.3495 0.3594
2016-17 West Bend Power NA3HL 47 33 28 61 1.298 0.1564 0.1529 0.4100 0.4008
2017-18 NA3HL 40 34 41 75 1.875 0.2259 0.2094
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SR 21 9 22 31 1.476
2020-21 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SO 8 3 6 9 1.125
2018-19 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 FR 26 8 13 21 0.808
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2018-19 · Southern New Hampshire
+405.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22512
Forward overall
#957
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2022-23
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.