| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | West Bend Power | NA3HL | 47 | 20 | 31 | 51 | 1.085 | 0.1308 | 0.1409 | 0.3428 | 0.3692 |
| 2015-16 | West Bend Power | NA3HL | 47 | 18 | 34 | 52 | 1.106 | 0.1333 | 0.1371 | 0.3495 | 0.3594 |
| 2016-17 | West Bend Power | NA3HL | 47 | 33 | 28 | 61 | 1.298 | 0.1564 | 0.1529 | 0.4100 | 0.4008 |
| 2017-18 | — | NA3HL | 40 | 34 | 41 | 75 | 1.875 | 0.2259 | 0.2094 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Southern New Hampshire | D2 | NE10 | SR | 21 | 9 | 22 | 31 | 1.476 |
| 2020-21 | Southern New Hampshire | D2 | NE10 | JR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2019-20 | Southern New Hampshire | D2 | NE10 | SO | 8 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 1.125 |
| 2018-19 | Southern New Hampshire | D2 | NE10 | FR | 26 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 0.808 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.