IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

C.J. Valerian Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-05-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 28 0 14 14 0.500 0.1073 0.1118 0.2449 0.2553
2014-15 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 42 7 23 30 0.714 0.1533 0.1526 0.3498 0.3483
2015-16 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 11 0 1 1 0.091 0.0338 0.0318 0.0962 0.0905
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 25 2 10 12 0.480
2020-21 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 10 1 1 2 0.200
2019-20 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 27 2 5 7 0.259
2018-19 New England College D3 LittleEast FR 15 2 8 10 0.667
2016-17 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 5 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#12454
Defenseman overall
#1638
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike McPherson
Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Hale
Augsburg · 2021-22
0.136 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Freel
Northland · 2017-18
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.