← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Hale Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 28 3 1 4 0.143 0.0910 0.1007 0.4282 0.4739
2018-19 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 17 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 43 5 9 14 0.326 0.1209 0.1209 0.3447 0.3447
2020-21 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 46 11 8 19 0.413 0.1533 0.1533 0.4373 0.4373
2021-22 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 58 15 23 38 0.655 0.2433 0.2300 0.6937 0.6557
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 21 1 2 3 0.143
2024-25 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 21 1 2 3 0.143
2023-24 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 24 2 7 9 0.375
2022-23 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 22 1 2 3 0.136
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2022-23 · Augsburg
-10.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21932
Forward overall
#793
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Augsburg · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.