IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vinny Post Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 53 20 18 38 0.717 0.2046 0.2059 0.5550 0.5584
2014-15 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 20 6 9 15 0.750 0.2140 0.2054 0.5806 0.5573
2015-16 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 26 7 11 18 0.692 0.1976 0.1801 0.5359 0.4885
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 27 5 7 12 0.444
2018-19 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 21 1 5 6 0.286
2017-18 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 16 1 5 6 0.375
2016-17 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 21 5 10 15 0.714
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2016-17 · Adrian
+338.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19647
Forward overall
#768
Forward born in 1995
#581
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Paul Vella
Skidmore · 2016-17
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
John Grealish
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Patrick
Stevenson · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.