IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derek Hansberry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-02-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Central Texas Blackhawks NAHL 56 12 20 32 0.571 0.2122 0.2042 0.6050 0.5821
2004-05 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 50 16 17 33 0.660 0.2451 0.2236 0.6988 0.6375
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — SR 27 16 9 25 0.926
2007-08 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — JR 27 19 19 38 1.407
2006-07 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — SO 29 21 14 35 1.207
2005-06 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — FR 27 18 16 34 1.259
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.26
2005-06 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+581.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16527
Forward overall
#567
Forward born in 1984
#1316
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tanner Froese
St. Norbert · 2013-14
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Billy Foulds
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Ganz
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2024-25
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.