← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zack Bross Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 52 5 10 15 0.288 0.0833 0.0855 0.2172 0.2229
2015-16 Minot Minotauros NAHL 60 12 19 31 0.517 0.1919 0.1885 0.5471 0.5374
2016-17 Minot Minotauros NAHL 58 15 25 40 0.690 0.2561 0.2376 0.7303 0.6776
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Long Island D1 31 4 5 9 0.290
2020-21 LIU D1 SR 11 4 2 6 0.545
2019-20 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast JR 24 9 14 23 0.958
2018-19 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SO 26 9 15 24 0.923
2017-18 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast FR 27 8 33 41 1.518
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.52
2017-18 · UMass Boston
+713.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20679
Forward overall
#859
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2023-24
0.933 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2021-22
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.