| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Nipawin Hawks | SJHL | 52 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0.288 | 0.0833 | 0.0855 | 0.2172 | 0.2229 |
| 2015-16 | Minot Minotauros | NAHL | 60 | 12 | 19 | 31 | 0.517 | 0.1919 | 0.1885 | 0.5471 | 0.5374 |
| 2016-17 | Minot Minotauros | NAHL | 58 | 15 | 25 | 40 | 0.690 | 0.2561 | 0.2376 | 0.7303 | 0.6776 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Long Island | D1 | — | — | 31 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0.290 |
| 2020-21 | LIU | D1 | — | SR | 11 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0.545 |
| 2019-20 | UMass Boston | D3 | HockeyEast | JR | 24 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 0.958 |
| 2018-19 | UMass Boston | D3 | HockeyEast | SO | 26 | 9 | 15 | 24 | 0.923 |
| 2017-18 | UMass Boston | D3 | HockeyEast | FR | 27 | 8 | 33 | 41 | 1.518 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.